Why You Should Curate Social Media
Social
Media is, if you'll forgive the expression, like sticking your head
inside an angry wasp hive and hoping you don't get stung. It sounds
like it shouldn't be, but at this point in the proceedings I think we
can probably all agree that though its useful (in a way that sticking
your head in a wasp hive isn't), the Internet, and especially sites
like Facebook, Twitter, and even LinkedIn, has enabled the worst
aspects of our species. That's not to say that we're all unpleasant
when we interact online, or that we aren't sometimes nasty in real
life (though I do tend to err on the side of that being less likely
than it being online). It's just that from Twitter mobs to cyber
stalking to the growth of "red pill" culture, it feels like
social media has enabled unpleasant views, and often disgusting
behaviour.
Now,
I'm not actually going to say that we should wave a magic wand and
get rid of this stuff: the genie's out of the bottle and its far,
far, too later for that. I do think there needs to be more of a
concrete idea of online etiquette, and that sites need to take more
steps to reinforce that sort of standard, if only to protect
themselves legally. At the end of the day though, its impossible, and
some would say immoral, to censor speech online. Like a perverse game
of whack a mole, you'll find that hitting it on the head may be very
satisfying, but it won't actually solve the problem.
This
is why I believe you should curate social media, and have an idea of
what you want it to do. Not in the sense of "durh, I want to
talk to peeple", but what are you getting out of it? Are you
using it to promote a business, or to keep in touch with family? Are
you agitating for some sort of social change, or just in it for the
cat videos? Each of these uses requires a different approach to the
platforms you use (yes, use, these things are, or should be tools,
and if you find they're more than that there may be a problem). In
the past I've maintained quite open policies for my social media use,
because I wanted to meet people, and make friends. That meant keeping
an "open door" policy. Now, I'm not so interested in that,
I'm more choosy about what I'm looking for and not so convinced that
accepting every friend request that rolls my way is a good thing to
do. Even if I do, then I don't always keep following, especially when
it seems like the new friend doesn't share any common ground with me.
In
addition, though, the walls of our social media bubbles are often
painfully porous. It's far too easy to encounter other people online
who are, frankly, tossers. On this platform especially so, as there's
no sitewide blocking, while on Twitter you have the bizarre
phenomenon of hate following, where users follow famous people just
to have a go at them.
No,
I don't understand that either. All I can say is that having that
much time on your hands must feel great, but don't these people have
anything else to do? Imagine what heights the human race could reach
if we stopped farting about with things like that and actually tried
to make stuff or to learn philosophy, or whatever would make us
better human beings.
The
porous nature of social media is one reason why we should curate our
bubbles. Block, mute, unfriend, whatever it takes, because even if
you think you're being the better person by not shutting out people,
you really aren't. You're just making it more difficult for yourself,
and you may be playing to ego. Are you really needed on the
barricades every time someone says something stupid? And if you
answered, why? What cost are you willing to pay for that conviction?
Given that social media now accounts for a major source of mental
health issues, are you willing to risk that just because you feel,
without evidence, that your expression of opprobrium means a damn
thing?
You're
far better to protect yourself by blocking and reporting the
offending person than you are trying to persuade them they've got the
wrong side of the stick. Add to that a claim I heard on
the Personality Hacker podcast that
social media is making us less intelligent and the wrinkles on our
brains are actually getting shallower*, and I wonder if online debate
does anything but waste our time. I already have a personal black
list of debates that includes topics like whether there's a deity,
Israel and Palestine, Feminism, and whether or not Captain America
could defeat Batman in a fight**... Simply because, unlike those hate
followers, I have shit to do.
The
other reason is that most of these people don't exist inside your
tribe, and they don't actually give two tugs of a dead dog's dick
about what you think. While ignoring bullies won't stop them bullying
you, ignoring, blocking, and reporting trolls online is absolutely
the right thing to do.
It
is possible to build strong networks on social media, but you can't
do that without a strong hand and a willingness to slam the door shut
on people you just don't want to know.
We
have stuff to do, and in the spirit of that I'm going to shut up now.
* I
haven't followed this up because I get queasy just thinking about
brains... which is a shame because I'm getting more interested in
cognition and neuro stuff as I get older.
** No, really... and
no I don't get why comic nerds get so hung up on it, either.
Comments
Post a Comment